================
@@ -91,6 +93,59 @@ EXTERN int omp_get_device_num(void) {
   return HostDevice;
 }
 
+EXTERN int omp_get_device_from_uid(const char *DeviceUid) {
+  TIMESCOPE();
+  OMPT_IF_BUILT(ReturnAddressSetterRAII RA(__builtin_return_address(0)));
+
+  if (!DeviceUid) {
+    DP("Call to omp_get_device_from_uid returning omp_invalid_device\n");
+    return omp_invalid_device;
+  }
+  if (strcmp(DeviceUid, GenericDeviceTy::getHostDeviceUid()) == 0) {
+    DP("Call to omp_get_device_from_uid returning host device number %d\n",
+       omp_get_initial_device());
+    return omp_get_initial_device();
+  }
+
+  int DeviceNum = omp_invalid_device;
+
+  auto ExclusiveDevicesAccessor = PM->getExclusiveDevicesAccessor();
+  for (const DeviceTy &Device : PM->devices(ExclusiveDevicesAccessor)) {
+    const char *Uid = Device.RTL->getDevice(Device.RTLDeviceID).getDeviceUid();
----------------
adurang wrote:

Sorry, not following your answer here. What I meant is that following what is 
done currently elsewhere it should look like:

`const char *Uid = Device.RTL->getDeviceUid(Device.RTLDeviceId);`

I'm not particularly fond of having the extra indirection but we probably 
should be consistent?  Plus, you could actually handle the special hostId if 
you wanted there.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164392
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to