================
@@ -1126,13 +1130,23 @@ PreservedAnalyses ExpandFpPass::run(Function &F,
FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM) {
AssumptionCache *AC = nullptr;
if (OptLevel != CodeGenOptLevel::None)
AC = &FAM.getResult<AssumptionAnalysis>(F);
+
+ auto &MAMProxy = FAM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F);
+ const RTLIB::RuntimeLibcallsInfo *Libcalls =
+ MAMProxy.getCachedResult<RuntimeLibraryAnalysis>(*F.getParent());
+ if (!Libcalls) {
+ F.getContext().emitError("'runtime-libcall-info' analysis required");
----------------
compnerd wrote:
Is this pattern widely used? Should this just be an `assert` instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165197
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
