vadorovsky wrote: > So looks like llvm21 will have an assertion for rust if without backport.
Yes, exactly. > Does it have problems before llvm21 say llvm20? Yes, the same problem occurs on LLVM 20 and earlier versions as well. But given that the Rust 1.91.0-beta is already using LLVM 21 and we should expect it to stabilize sometime soon (definitely before holidays / the end of year), I'm fine with backporting the fixes only to LLVM 21. > In general, I am okay with backport so llvm21 can work for rust bpf part as > llvm22 may need some time to be available. Thank you! Yes, without the backport to LLVM 21, the timeline would become pretty long - we could expect Rust nightly to switch to LLVM 22 around February 2026 and a stable Rust version around spring 2026. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
