Author: Ehsan Amiri
Date: 2025-10-31T14:46:02-04:00
New Revision: 289f9673d266955ed2a015b2ac730fd61c5cfa85

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/289f9673d266955ed2a015b2ac730fd61c5cfa85
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/289f9673d266955ed2a015b2ac730fd61c5cfa85.diff

LOG: Revert "[DA] Check for overflow in strong SIV test (#164704)"

This reverts commit 1b3e7df195f4900a858e97a887e47eddd6dabdfe.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
    llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheck.ll
    llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
index e45d1f79b3165..11d829492a10e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -1587,15 +1587,6 @@ static const SCEV *minusSCEVNoSignedOverflow(const SCEV 
*A, const SCEV *B,
   return nullptr;
 }
 
-/// Returns \p A * \p B if it guaranteed not to signed wrap. Otherwise returns
-/// nullptr. \p A and \p B must have the same integer type.
-static const SCEV *mulSCEVNoSignedOverflow(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B,
-                                           ScalarEvolution &SE) {
-  if (SE.willNotOverflow(Instruction::Mul, /*Signed=*/true, A, B))
-    return SE.getMulExpr(A, B);
-  return nullptr;
-}
-
 /// Returns the absolute value of \p A. In the context of dependence analysis,
 /// we need an absolute value in a mathematical sense. If \p A is the signed
 /// minimum value, we cannot represent it unless extending the original type.
@@ -1695,11 +1686,7 @@ bool DependenceInfo::strongSIVtest(const SCEV *Coeff, 
const SCEV *SrcConst,
   assert(0 < Level && Level <= CommonLevels && "level out of range");
   Level--;
 
-  const SCEV *Delta = minusSCEVNoSignedOverflow(SrcConst, DstConst, *SE);
-  if (!Delta) {
-    Result.Consistent = false;
-    return false;
-  }
+  const SCEV *Delta = SE->getMinusSCEV(SrcConst, DstConst);
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    Delta = " << *Delta);
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ", " << *Delta->getType() << "\n");
 
@@ -1715,9 +1702,7 @@ bool DependenceInfo::strongSIVtest(const SCEV *Coeff, 
const SCEV *SrcConst,
     const SCEV *AbsCoeff = absSCEVNoSignedOverflow(Coeff, *SE);
     if (!AbsDelta || !AbsCoeff)
       return false;
-    const SCEV *Product = mulSCEVNoSignedOverflow(UpperBound, AbsCoeff, *SE);
-    if (!Product)
-      return false;
+    const SCEV *Product = SE->getMulExpr(UpperBound, AbsCoeff);
     return isKnownPredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_SGT, AbsDelta, Product);
   }();
   if (IsDeltaLarge) {

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheck.ll 
b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheck.ll
index 181a4494b036e..4346507ba8f90 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheck.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheck.ll
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ define void @t3(i64 %n, i64 %m, i64 %lb, ptr %a) {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %2 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: %2 = load 
i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %2 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%2, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - anti [1 *]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - consistent anti [1 -2]!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %2, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%2, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll 
b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
index 160196284f415..44bd9b7727910 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by 
utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
 ; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -aa-pipeline=basic-aa 2>&1 
\
-; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-ALL
-; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -aa-pipeline=basic-aa 
-da-enable-dependence-test=strong-siv 2>&1 \
-; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-STRONG-SIV
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = 
"e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.6.0"
@@ -425,33 +423,19 @@ for.end:                                          ; preds 
= %for.body
 ;;    *B++ = A[i + 2*n];
 
 define void @strong9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
-; CHECK-ALL-LABEL: 'strong9'
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store 
i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = 
load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store 
i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = 
load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store 
i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store 
i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-LABEL: 'strong9'
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> 
Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> 
Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [*|<]!
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> 
Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: 
%0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: 
store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: 
store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'strong9'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load 
i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load 
i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
%0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -528,45 +512,3 @@ for.body:                                         ; preds 
= %entry, %for.body
 for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.body
   ret void
 }
-
-
-;;  for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 9223372036854775806; i++)
-;;    for (long unsigned j = 0; j < 2147483640; j++)
-;;      if (i < 3000000000)
-;;        A[i] = 0;
-;
-; FIXME: DependenceAnalysis fails to detect the dependency between A[i] and
-; itself, while Strong SIV has been able to prove it.
-define void @strong11(ptr %A) nounwind uwtable ssp {
-; CHECK-ALL-LABEL: 'strong11'
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:  Src: store i32 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 
0, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-ALL-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-LABEL: 'strong11'
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:  Src: store i32 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: 
store i32 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-STRONG-SIV-NEXT:    da analyze - consistent output [0 S]!
-;
-entry:
-  br label %for.cond1.preheader
-
-for.cond1.preheader:                              ; preds = %entry, 
%for.cond.cleanup3
-  %i.017 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc8, %for.cond.cleanup3 ]
-  %cmp5 = icmp samesign ult i64 %i.017, 3000000000
-  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr %A, i64 %i.017
-  br i1 %cmp5, label %for.body4.us, label %for.cond.cleanup3
-
-for.body4.us:                                     ; preds = 
%for.cond1.preheader, %for.body4.us
-  %j.016.us = phi i64 [ %inc.us, %for.body4.us ], [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader ]
-  store i32 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-  %inc.us = add nuw nsw i64 %j.016.us, 1
-  %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %inc.us, 2147483640
-  br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup3, label %for.body4.us
-
-for.cond.cleanup:                                 ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup3
-  ret void
-
-for.cond.cleanup3:                                ; preds = %for.body4.us, 
%for.cond1.preheader
-  %inc8 = add nuw nsw i64 %i.017, 1
-  %exitcond19.not = icmp eq i64 %inc8, 9223372036854775806
-  br i1 %exitcond19.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.cond1.preheader
-}


        
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to