paschalis-mpeis wrote: Sounds good. So BOLT doesnt know whether inconsistencies are due to sync/async unwind tables, but instead makes an assumption to help the user? Could you summarise this with a comment in code around the point you emit the warning?
Since you are on this, should it handle cases like the below? (we've started seeing these recently) > BOLT-INFO: MarkRAStates ran on 0 functions. Ignored 0 functions (nan%) > because of CFI inconsistencies https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165227 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
