github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
index 713ef7795..264e6c866 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
@@ -1670,9 +1670,8 @@ void
TwoAddressInstructionImpl::processTiedPairs(MachineInstr *MI,
if (MI->isBundle()) {
for (MachineOperand &MO : mi_bundle_ops(*MI)) {
if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg() == RegB) {
- assert(
- MO.getSubReg() == 0 &&
- "tied subregister uses in bundled instructions not supported");
+ assert(MO.getSubReg() == 0 &&
+ "tied subregister uses in bundled instructions not
supported");
MO.setReg(RegA);
}
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166212
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
