================
@@ -5183,17 +5187,15 @@
LoopVectorizationCostModel::getMemInstScalarizationCost(Instruction *I,
return Cost;
}
-InstructionCost
-LoopVectorizationCostModel::getConsecutiveMemOpCost(Instruction *I,
- ElementCount VF) {
+InstructionCost LoopVectorizationCostModel::getConsecutiveMemOpCost(
+ Instruction *I, ElementCount VF, InstWidening Decision) {
Type *ValTy = getLoadStoreType(I);
auto *VectorTy = cast<VectorType>(toVectorTy(ValTy, VF));
- Value *Ptr = getLoadStorePointerOperand(I);
unsigned AS = getLoadStoreAddressSpace(I);
- int ConsecutiveStride = Legal->isConsecutivePtr(ValTy, Ptr);
+ enum TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind = TTI::TCK_RecipThroughput;
----------------
david-arm wrote:
I don't think this is correct because we sometimes optimise for size. You can
delete this line, since LoopVectorizationCostModel already has a CostKind
member.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140722
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
