================
@@ -182,10 +182,63 @@ foreach FPTy = ["F32", "F64", "F80", "F128", "PPCF128"]
in {
def MODF_#FPTy : RuntimeLibcall;
}
-foreach VecTy = ["V4F32", "V2F64", "NXV4F32", "NXV2F64"] in {
- def MODF_#VecTy : RuntimeLibcall;
- def SINCOS_#VecTy : RuntimeLibcall;
- def SINCOSPI_#VecTy : RuntimeLibcall;
+defvar F32VectorSuffixes = ["V2F32", "V4F32", "V8F32", "V16F32", "NXV4F32"];
+defvar F64VectorSuffixes = ["V2F64", "V4F64", "V8F64", "NXV2F64"];
----------------
arsenm wrote:
I think it helps see the scope of exactly what tablegen needs to be able to
express. At this point I think the bigger problem is expressing the logical
groups of functions per library is more pressing than the type signatures
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167026
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
