cjacek wrote:

Waiting for LLVM 22 is fine with me. It seemed safe enough and fixes issue 
#165504, but at the same time it shouldn’t affect properly written code (the 
repro in the report doesn’t follow the ARM64EC convention).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168371
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to