================ @@ -3141,6 +3141,17 @@ defm experimental_omit_vtable_rtti : BoolFOption<"experimental-omit-vtable-rtti" NegFlag<SetFalse, [], [CC1Option], "Do not omit">, BothFlags<[], [CC1Option], " the RTTI component from virtual tables">>; +defm experimental_pointer_field_protection : BoolFOption<"experimental-pointer-field-protection", + LangOpts<"PointerFieldProtection">, DefaultFalse, + PosFlag<SetTrue, [], [CC1Option], "Enable">, + NegFlag<SetFalse, [], [], "Do not enable">, + BothFlags<[], [ClangOption], " pointer field protection on all non-standard layout struct types">>; +defm experimental_pointer_field_protection_tagged : BoolFOption<"experimental-pointer-field-protection-tagged", ---------------- fmayer wrote:
as discussed offline, i would prefer if there was a flag to enable the `[[clang:pointer_field_protection]]` while this feature is experimental to avoid accidental enablement https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133538 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
