wangpc-pp wrote: > > Hi @asb, @topperc and @preames, I'm a bit hesitant to take this fix into > > the release branch because it seems a bit large for what is essentially the > > last release of the 21.x branch. After this there will be no more releases, > > so no chances to fix any issues that may arise. The fact that one was > > already found when backporting the fix makes me even more worried. As the > > owners of the RISCV backend, do any of you have any thoughts on how risky > > it would be to take this fix in 21.x or should we just wait for the 22.x > > branch for the fix? > > @lukel97 @wangpc-pp Is the change to RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos.td enough to fix > the bug? Was the RISCVVectorPeephole.cpp part for correctness or to prevent > regressions?
But I think the regression can be large. :-( https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170604 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
