snprajwal wrote:

No, this specific code path has always produced incorrect output, even in past 
versions of LLVM. I took care to keep the scope of the change as small as 
possible to reduce the risk for this backport.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171522
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to