matthias-springer wrote: > Part of it is folding constantOp into memref.store.
This is not part of the pattern. I just needed a side-effecting op in the test case. > Part of it is the functionality of remove-dead-values, but I believe it ought > to be implemented within remove-dead-values. `remove-dead-values` indeed performs this kind of folding. I'm trying to remove this as part of #173505 and this PR is in preparation of that change. I am going to send an RFC for that soon. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/173560 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
