github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
llvm/lib/Analysis/StaticDataProfileInfo.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp
index d56fd90a4..81ff6586b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ static cl::opt<bool> AnnotateStaticDataSectionPrefix(
"memprof-annotate-static-data-prefix", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("If true, annotate the static data section prefix"));
-
// Matching statistics
STATISTIC(NumOfMemProfMissing, "Number of functions without memory profile.");
STATISTIC(NumOfMemProfMismatch,
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178336
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
