MacDue wrote: > Do the ll tests represent the expected input IR? If yes then I think this > would be better implemented as an IR canonicalisation.
I have already implemented that, but it's pretty unlikely it'd be accepted. In the past I've been told that folding to the `vector.reduce.*` intrinsics is less canonical, as more combines/optimizations understand the scalar form. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181162 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
