dyung wrote: > > From my reading of the bug, it seems this can easily be worked around by > > renaming the produced binary? Is that not the case? > > It can be worked around that way yes. Wouldn't this still count as a build > failure when building lldb, even if there is a manual workaround for it?
That's true. When did it start failing? Or has it always failed in this way? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197493 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
