jayfoad wrote:

> > Then should just fix those bugs? It doesn't make any sense to introduce a 
> > second control, when one already exists, and the purpose is just to hide a 
> > bug
> 
> That would be the ideal way, yes.

If I understand correctly, this is what #201004 is trying to do.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176693
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to