================
@@ -8222,6 +8226,61 @@ convertOmpTarget(Operation &opInst, llvm::IRBuilderBase
&builder,
bool isOffloadEntry =
isTargetDevice || !ompBuilder->Config.TargetTriples.empty();
+ // Validate and resolve in_reduction clauses on omp.target. We currently
+ // only support the non-offload host-fallback path: the per-task private
+ // pointer is obtained by calling __kmpc_task_reduction_get_th_data inside
+ // the to-be-outlined target task body. Threading that pointer through the
+ // device kernel argument list is left as follow-up work.
+ SmallVector<llvm::Value *> inRedOrigPtrs;
+ if (!targetOp.getInReductionVars().empty()) {
+ if (isTargetDevice || isOffloadEntry)
+ return opInst.emitError(
+ "not yet implemented: in_reduction clause on omp.target with "
+ "offload / target-device compilation");
+ if (auto inRedSyms = targetOp.getInReductionSyms()) {
+ for (auto sym : inRedSyms->getAsRange<SymbolRefAttr>()) {
+ auto decl =
+ SymbolTable::lookupNearestSymbolFrom<omp::DeclareReductionOp>(
+ targetOp, sym);
+ if (!decl)
+ return targetOp.emitError()
+ << "failed to resolve in_reduction declare_reduction symbol "
+ << sym.getRootReference() << " on omp.target";
----------------
skatrak wrote:
This is already checked by `verifyReductionVarList`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199967
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
