vitalybuka wrote: > I see you've been working on both this and the original PR (#149886), and > they seem to contain duplicate code. Am I right in thinking that this PR aims > to implement the functionality, and the intent is to rebase the other PR on > this one, and do the actual enablement there? > > If so that generally sounds fine, and this LGTM.
Correct. I will rebased that one. I like stacked PRs but, it's tricky here. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/202854 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
