jyknight wrote: > I think which one is preferable depends on the case. The rST file already > used both styles (and did not always make the best choice between them).
I had only noticed the cases where it was switched -- and in many of those, the tabular version is significantly more readable in the source than the list-table version. I do see that there's other cases which currently use `.. list-table::` in the rST. And, at first impression, I'd say that switching (at least some) of those into the tabular format would make _them_ be significantly less readable than the list-table format they use now. So, yeah, keep existing style would be good, I think. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/201975 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
