github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp,h --
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Sequence.h llvm/unittests/ADT/SequenceTest.cpp
--diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ADT/SequenceTest.cpp
b/llvm/unittests/ADT/SequenceTest.cpp
index 28ad26ee4..ac35798e9 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ADT/SequenceTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ADT/SequenceTest.cpp
@@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ TEST(SequenceTest, IterableEnums) {
enum_seq_inclusive(TypedEnum::B, TypedEnum::B)));
EXPECT_THAT(enum_seq(X::ScopedEnum::C, X::ScopedEnum::C), IsEmpty());
- static_assert(
- elem::ElementsAre<X::ScopedEnum>(enum_seq(X::ScopedEnum::C,
X::ScopedEnum::C)));
+ static_assert(elem::ElementsAre<X::ScopedEnum>(
+ enum_seq(X::ScopedEnum::C, X::ScopedEnum::C)));
EXPECT_THAT(enum_seq_inclusive(X::ScopedEnum::C, X::ScopedEnum::C),
ElementsAre(X::ScopedEnum::C));
static_assert(elem::ElementsAre<X::ScopedEnum, X::ScopedEnum::C>(
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/210405
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
