gerekon wrote: > I think this would be better to land sooner, rather than later. Whilst it > isn't a direct bug fix, its required to make parts of the upstream rust-lang > test suite pass (currently skipped), but perhaps more importantly, the > primary target for this architecture is embedded, and fp16 support is pretty > crucial. Given that its an experimental target, I think we can afford the > (low) risk in merging this. > > cc: @gerekon
Agree. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212055 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
