DavidSpickett wrote:

We have not had any bugs linked to this (yet), but since 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/08c94c0ac3b503dd4971da8935001aba01918688
 was first present in 23 and it's so clearly a mistake I thought it was a good 
backport candidate.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222048
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to