mgcarrasco wrote: @MrSidims huge thanks once again for your input on this. Let me know what you think.
I've revisited things further. I think you're right and the features from .200 that we strictly need for HIP are: 1. The changes in DebugLexicalScope for `inline namespace` 2. The changes in DebugTypeMember for `bitfields` Regarding the new DWARF operations in .200 (this PR), I think now that is not strictly necessary for HIP because: 1. The .100 subset is enough as long as the IR remains unoptimised as we do _now_ for HIP when targeting SPIRV. 2. The extra operations that we need are related to heterogenous DWARF and are not included in .200. So based on this I may put this PR on hold until strictly necessary to prioritize others. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/223461 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
