vgvassilev wrote: > @Vipul-Cariappa Thanks for the backport. This isn't a regression (the old > cleanup behavior is also in 22.x) and doesn't look critical, so I'm not sure > it meets the bar for a 23.x point release. Is there a reason it needs to be > in 23.x rather than 24?
tl;dr; that blocks a downstream consumer from moving to llvm23. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/225686 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
