https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26961
Bug ID: 26961
Summary: non-standard implementation issue
Product: libc++
Version: 3.8
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: All Bugs
Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
Reporter: ionelpopesc...@yahoo.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, mclow.li...@gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
The C++11 standard defines pointer_safety as:
enum class pointer_safety { relaxed, preferred, strict };
But, currently pointer_safety is implemented as a struct.
This causes that the following test to fail, because it is initialized by a
constructor that takes an int:
#include <memory>
int main()
{
std::pointer_safety d ;
d = std::get_pointer_safety();
return 0;
}
test.cpp:5:25: error: no matching constructor for initialization of
'std::pointer_safety'
std::pointer_safety d ;
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:5406:5: note: candidate constructor not viable:
requires single argument '__v', but no arguments were provided
pointer_safety(__lx __v) : __v_(__v) {}
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:5394:25: note: candidate constructor (the implicit
copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS pointer_safety
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:5394:25: note: candidate constructor (the implicit
move constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
1 error generated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
