https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31168
Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |e...@efcs.ca
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> ---
Closing as RESOLVED INVALID since the LFTS v1 spec doesn't specify
operator>(optional, optional) in terms of T::operator> but the C++1z draft
does.
Maybe libc++ should just make std::experimental::optional an alias for
std::optional?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
