https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36236
David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC| |dblai...@gmail.com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> ---
I believe this is correct behavior for C99. GCC does the same thing:
$ cat inl.c
inline void foo() {
}
int main() {
foo();
}
$ gcc inl.c -std=c99
/tmp/ccMjLRUx.o: In function `main':
inl.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `foo'
I can't find the proper reference for it, but my understanding is that in C the
inlinable definition is potentially separate from the non-inlined definition (
https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/myth-and-reality-about-inline-in-c99/
discusses this with examples)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
