https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37148
Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk
--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> ---
We're generally not interested in implementing non-standard language extensions
for you. You are of course welcome to implement this yourself in your own fork
of Clang. If and when you can meet our requirements for language extensions
(http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html) we would consider incorporating such
a feature into upstream clang, but not before.
I would expect that implementing the feature in your own fork of Clang should
be sufficient to satisfy WG14's desire for an implementation to exist prior to
standardization.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
