Reid Kleckner <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
 Fixed By Commit(s)|                            |r356425
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Reid Kleckner <> ---
r356425 should fix this. Instead of doing as suggested and emitting the
destructor, the fix was to not reference it, because derived2_class is
abstract, and the call to destroy derived_class was actually dead. We don't
have to construct it or destroy virtual bases of abstract classes. r356425
implements that optimization.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
llvm-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to