https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26492
lab...@google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from lab...@google.com ---
The test has been rewritten (r358266) to not depend on unwinding out of libc
internals, so it should no longer fail. It's possible something could be done
to make us unwind better in this scenario, but it's hard to figure out what
that scenario from the report, so this bug is not very useful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
