https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42071
Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> ---
Interesting. This issue predates the commit in question; all versions of clang
accept:
// operator name as name of template parameter
template<int operator+> struct X {};
// template-id as name of template parameter
template<typename T> struct Y {};
template<int Y<int> > struct Z {};
// qualified-id as name of template parameter
struct Q {};
template<int Q::Z> struct R {};
The relevant commit causes us to start additionally accepting this case:
template <int A<void> > struct C;
(where A is not declared at all).
Fixed in r363446.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
