https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949
George Burgess <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from George Burgess <[email protected]> ---
So a huge hint at the reason we aren't doing better was sitting right in front
of me when I was looking at r359844, yet I didn't see it. :)
I agree that it's very likely that we don't want to do interprocedural analysis
in the frontend to (partially) support this, so I'm marking this as WAI.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
