| Issue |
61518
|
| Summary |
Initializing a _Complex variable with an initializer list with too many items highlights the wrong item
|
| Labels |
good first issue,
clang:frontend,
clang:diagnostics
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
tbaederr
|
See:
```c++
constexpr _Complex double d = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 45};
constexpr double e[2] = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 45};
```
Godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/P7vqM4dq9
Output:
```console
<source>:3:37: error: excess elements in scalar initializer
constexpr _Complex double d = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 45};
^~~
<source>:4:42: error: excess elements in array initializer
constexpr double e[2] = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 45};
^~~
```
Clang highlights the second entry for the `_Complex` variable, but it should highlight the first I think.
I have other issues with the diagnostics here, but since this is about `_Complex` and that is a fringe feature anyway, I don't care much about those and fixing the off-by-one error should be enough.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
