| Issue |
115622
|
| Summary |
[clang-tidy] suggest adding `constexpr` when it is possible
|
| Labels |
clang-tidy,
check-request
|
| Assignees |
5chmidti
|
| Reporter |
5chmidti
|
Add a check to suggest adding `constexpr` to variables and functions to the extent that each standard version allows. Using `constexpr` can, e.g., potentially uncover UB in code, as that is not permitted in a `constexpr` context.
I'm refactoring my prototype that ran successfully on the `clang` and `clang-tools-extra` targets (using a more restrictive mode than the standard permits) with working fixits. I need to finish the implementation, add more tests, and evaluate the check against some code-bases before posting the PR though.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
