Issue 129955
Summary s390x: `llvm.fshl.i128` is not optimized well
Labels new issue
Assignees
Reporter folkertdev
    The [llvm.fshl](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-fshl-intrinsic) intrinsic is neat. Sadly, the s390x backend does not pick good instructions for it. 

https://godbolt.org/z/j6Kcob8oa

e.g. this LLVM IR


```llvm
define noundef <16 x i8> @vec_sld_manual(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i8> %b) unnamed_addr {
start:
  %0 = bitcast <16 x i8> %a to i128
  %1 = bitcast <16 x i8> %b to i128
  %_3 = tail call noundef i128 @llvm.fshl.i128(i128 noundef %0, i128 noundef %1, i128 noundef 32) #4
  %2 = bitcast i128 %_3 to <16 x i8>
  ret <16 x i8> %2
}

define <16 x i8> @vec_sld_builtin(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i8> %b) unnamed_addr {
start:
  %_0 = tail call <16 x i8> @llvm.s390.vsldb(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i8> %b, i32 noundef 4) #4
  ret <16 x i8> %_0
}

declare i128 @llvm.fshl.i128(i128, i128, i128) unnamed_addr #2

declare <16 x i8> @llvm.s390.vsldb(<16 x i8>, <16 x i8>, i32 immarg) unnamed_addr #3
```

A `llvm.fshl.i128` with a compile-time known value that is a multiple of 8 can be lowered to a `vsldb`, but that does not happen 

```asm
vec_sld_manual:
        vrepib  %v0, 96
        vsrlb   %v0, %v26, %v0
        vrepib  %v1, 32
        vslb    %v1, %v24, %v1
 vo      %v24, %v1, %v0
        br      %r14

vec_sld_builtin:
 vsldb   %v24, %v24, %v26, 4
        br      %r14
```

analogous simplifications are possible for `vec_sldw` and `vec_sldb`

_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs

Reply via email to