| Issue |
134658
|
| Summary |
Clang not diagnosing invalid literals in unevaluated contexts
|
| Labels |
clang
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
kyuupichan
|
I cannot find anything that permits a compiler to accept the following (in either the C or C++ standards). Integer literals must have a type and a value in range for that type:
#if 0? 999999999999999999999999999999999999: 3
#endif
Clang accepts it even with -pedantic-errors. It seems that GCC, EDG and MSVC all reject it.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
