| Issue |
151631
|
| Summary |
[Clang] Clang and GCC diverge on acceptance of function declaration inside constructor body
|
| Labels |
clang
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
Xniao
|
I'm seeking clarification on whether the following code is well-formed C++.
Repro: https://godbolt.org/z/jKsaj9a9E
GCC rejects it with:
```
<source>: In constructor 'S2::S2()':
<source>:7:5: error: return type specification for constructor invalid
7 | S2(S2());
| ^~
<source>:7:12: error: 'S2' declared in a non-class scope
7 | S2(S2());
| ^
Compiler returned: 1
```
However, Clang and MSVC both accept it.
## Program
```cpp
class S2 {
int a;
public:
S2(S2 &s2) : a(s2.a) {}
S2() : a(0) {
S2(S2());
}
};
int main() {
S2 s;
}
```
Is one compiler incorrect or not? Thank you for your time and insight!
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
