| Issue |
168920
|
| Summary |
[LLDB] Swig python extensions are missing test coverage
|
| Labels |
good first issue,
lldb
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
Jlalond
|
@jimingham pointed out on #168619 that a lot of the lldb extensions are either not tested or don't have direct testing. I've opened this issue as a good new user issue.
The largest offenders are
- [SBFrameExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBFrameExtensions.i#L4)
- [SBTargetExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBThreadExtensions.i)
- [SBProcessExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBProcessExtensions.i)
While target and valueobject actually have more properties, a quick grep showed a lot of these are exercised in existing tests.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
