Issue 203199
Summary [llvm-exegesis] Add "did you mean ?" style hint for unknown instruction opcodes
Labels good first issue, tools:llvm-exegesis
Assignees
Reporter RKSimon
    Followup to #144403 / #201162 - which enabled us to skip and report unknown instruction opcodes instead of just failing

It would be very useful if the report added a "did you mean ?" style hint (see OptTable::findNearest for exmaples):

```
warning: skipping benchmark entry: No opcode with name 'VADDPDYrrr' - did you mean 'VADDPDYrr' ?
```
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs

Reply via email to