Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >>> >>>> Absolutely true. This change will cause the test to fail on the BSDs, >>>> which will complain that malloc.h has been replaced by stdlib.h. >>>> Please >>>> use a different test. >>> >>> Better yet, just unconditionally #include <stdlib.h> and eliminate >>> <malloc.h> >>> >>> -Chris >> >> It already does include stdlib.h. I assume it isn't enough on his >> system. > > Andrew, can alpha drop the malloc.h #include? If not, why not? > > We should remove all instances of malloc.h from llvm-test. > > -Chris
A more interesting question is why he needed to add it for x86_64. If Linux doesn't need it for x86, it shouldn't need it for x86_64 either. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
