That's fine. Please check in what you have now after you've merged in the recent changes.
Thanks, Evan On May 23, 2007, at 11:52 AM, David Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > >> What did Evan ask for? Are you referring to the addrequired bit? > > Not sure what you mean by "addrequired bit." > > If I understand correctly, Evan wants me to create an infrastructure > to allow pluggable coalescers. > > I'd rather not do that right now as I've got a ton of other things > on my plate. It turns out that I'll be writing another colaescer > sometime in the future so this functionality will be needed but > I'd rather keep this particular patch as small as possible (it's > already big) and do the pluggable coalescer infrastructure separately. > > If I've got to write this other infrastructure now, it'll probably be > a few weeks at least before I'd have anything, and possibly longer. > I think it's best to get coalescing separated from liveness analysis > ASAP so Evan and others can make tweaks to both without disrupting > future patches. > > Ok? > > -Dave > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits