On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Tanya, > >> The attached patch creates a global to track functions that should >> not be inlined (noinline attribute). The llvm inliner will need to be >> modified to make use of it. > Why don't use the function attribute for "noinline"? This seems to be > natural way to handle such things.
Attribute is natural way, if significant percentage of total functions is annotated with "noinline", which is not the case here. - Devang _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
