>> Are you saying such a fix exists already, or that this is how a fix >> should work? If the latter, I'd prefer to just revert the change to >> the instructions that use xor so that they are not marked >> rematerializable for now (though the ones that use pxor/xorps/xorpd >> are ok). > > s/current/correct :-) I've already implemented it though.
Ok, thanks! > Why do you prefer to revert the change? I don't, now that the fix is in. Dan -- Dan Gohman, Cray Inc. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
