On 10/18/07, Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In the case of this fix, we don't want to use even > >> _Unwind_SjLj_Resume (it's what I tried initially and got the same > >> type of error). > > > > So how do you continue unwinding exceptions? If code should never > > get to the unwind block then you can always make the unwind-resume > > function be a call to abort() for objc with sjlj. That said, I > > suggest you read the comments in ada/raise.c starting from line 368 > > (llvm-gcc-4.0). I would be amazed if sjlj really works without > > proper tables, except in easy cases. > > I think the objc front-end is emitting the setjmp/longjmp calls > itself directly, not relying on the rest of the GCC EH mechanisms... > Yes. That's my understanding. If you look at obj-act.c:next_sjlj_build_try_catch_finally(), it has a big comment showing what it converts try-catch-finalize to.
-bw _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
