Hi!
Here is a quick patch to get
test/Feature/llvm2cpp.ll
to pass on SPARC.
the addition of -lmalloc should not harm
on other platforms, right?
Cheers,
Gabor
PS: This knocks down the SPARC failures to
# of expected passes 2006
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 9
Of the 4 unexpecteds I have 3 because of OCaml (old compiler)
and 1 because of PR http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1557
Index: test/Feature/llvm2cpp.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Feature/llvm2cpp.ll (revision 43249)
+++ test/Feature/llvm2cpp.ll (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llvm-dis > %t1.ll
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llvm2cpp -gen-program -o %t2.cpp - -f
-; RUN: %link -o %t2.exe %t2.cpp -lLLVMCore -lLLVMSupport -lLLVMSystem -lstdc++
+; RUN: %link -o %t2.exe %t2.cpp -lLLVMCore -lLLVMSupport -lLLVMSystem -lstdc++
-lmalloc
; RUN: ./%t2.exe > %t2.ll
; RUN: diff %t1.ll %t2.ll
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
