Author: resistor
Date: Thu Oct 25 01:50:30 2007
New Revision: 43333

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=43333&view=rev
Log:
Fix an obvious typo.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html

Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html?rev=43333&r1=43332&r2=43333&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html Thu Oct 25 01:50:30 2007
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
 </div>
 
 <p>Well, that was easy.  :)  In practice, we recommend always using
-<tt>LLVMConstantBuilder</tt> when generating code like this.  It has no
+<tt>LLVMFoldingBuilder</tt> when generating code like this.  It has no
 "syntactic overhead" for its use (you don't have to uglify your compiler with
 constant checks everywhere) and it can dramatically reduce the amount of
 LLVM IR that is generated in some cases (particular for languages with a macro


_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

Reply via email to