http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2470
Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-21 15:20:14 ---
I contend that we don't need to know that the call to operator new actually
allocates memory, just so long as the pointers it returns don't partially
overlap and we know that we perform the store to them afterwards.
But your second point is a very good one I'd completely forgotten. Each member
function gets the this pointer which could be used to modify the vptr, short of
field-sensitive interprocedural alias analysis proving otherwise.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
