http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2319
Dan Gohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Dan Gohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-14 09:58:14 ---
Using GOMP_atomic_start/GOMP_atomic_end is appropriate for
that testcase, since x86 doesn't have long double atomic
operations.
The problem of supporting i128 on x86-32 is one of supporting
return values that don't fit in ABI-designated return registers.
This is being tracked with PR2660.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2660 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
