http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Chris Lattner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Chris Lattner <[email protected]> 2009-03-08 23:47:46 --- Fixed: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090302/074859.html Opaque is specifically allowed because it is theoretically possible for the opaque types to be resolved with llvm-link, and this is a pseudo-feature for languages that want to lazily define their object model this way. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
